You have five maps of your integrations. None of them agree, and none are current. Foundation reads one you can trust.
Integration estates grow faster than anyone can document. Dependencies live in tickets, configs, and the heads of the people who built them. Foundation reads across what you already run and keeps a current, cited map of what connects to what, nothing changed without your sign-off.
Vendor is deprecating the v2 payments endpoint in 90 days. What breaks?
Foundation on Northgate Financial, an illustrative estate. The data is staged; the interactions are real.
Click a citation · find the undocumented read · approve or decline the write
Asked · K. Adeyemi, Integration Architect
Vendor is deprecating the v2 payments endpoint in 90 days. What breaks?
Treasury dashboard
Bypasses the integration layer entirely
Reads the payments database directly. It is in no interface catalogue.
It never crossed the integration platform, so no diagram or catalogue has ever shown it. It lives in a connection string.
Needs action
Every finding is backed by a record you can open. Nothing is asserted without a source.
The remaining six consumers already call v3, confirmed from deployed configuration rather than from the catalogue.
For the people accountable when an integration breaks
Enterprise architects, integration program directors, and the systems integrators delivering for them. If a change in one vendor can ripple through a dozen downstream systems and you're the one who has to know where, this is built for you.
The dependency map is in everyone’s head and nowhere on paper
You can't govern what you can't see, and no one sees the whole integration estate at once. That gap doesn't close by drawing another diagram that's stale by the next release.
Dependencies are undocumented and moving
Every release changes what connects to what. The documentation, where it exists, describes the estate as it was, not as it is.
One change, unknown blast radius
A vendor deprecates an endpoint and the question is which downstream systems break, in which environment, before the change window closes. Today that answer is a meeting, not a query.
Evidence chains that don't hold up
DORA registers and resilience mapping ask for the dependency chain end to end, cited to source. Assembling it by hand takes weeks and is stale on delivery.
How Foundation maps your integration estate
Not another diagramming tool. A layer that reads your live systems and keeps the dependency picture current, cited, and governed.
Same four steps everywhere Foundation runs. Only the domain changes.
What a current dependency map gets you
The blast radius, before you ship
When the change ticket is raised, ask what it touches downstream and get the dependency path, cited, before the CAB meets.
Audit-ready evidence chains
Trace a data flow end to end, each hop cited to its source. What we retain, and how we delete it, is itemized on our trust page.
Named on both sides
Your access is governed, and so is ours. Trucast's own access to your environment is a named, scoped, logged seat, not hidden admin: you see who we are, what we can read, and every action we take.
A clean exit
Read access is a credential you revoke in one click. Nothing changed in your systems except what your people approved, each change logged.
See your integration estate, mapped from your own systems
The fastest way to see it is to watch Foundation read a stand-in of your estate and cite each dependency, built on representative data, not your live systems. You operate it before either side commits, priced up front.